top of page

“Sebastian and Antonio Analysis” Original

Based on how Sebastian and Antonio treat Gonzalo while he tries to cheer up the king, the reader can conclude that they are cynical and make jokes of everything whenever possible. With every remark Gonzalo says, they repeat back with a joking or snide remark. They try to beat Gonzalo’s bright words down constantly, such as when Gonzalo speaks of how bright the grass is and Antonio spouts “He misses not much.” (II.i.759), so as to say that Gonzalo does not mind losing all that he once had.

 

 

“Sebastian and Antonio Analysis” Revised

Based on the actions of Sebastian and Antonio throughout the story, it is easy to deduce that they are static characters with the main purpose of being the antagonists of the play. Antonio, being the brother of Prospero and being the main person behind the devilish scheme against Prospero, is the main evil character of the play. As Prospero said while describing Antonio to Miranda right before he tells her about Antonio kicking him out of the kingdom, “Mark his condition and the event; then tell me/If this might be a brother”, saying he was unloving and terrible toward Prospero in terms of getting his rule (I.ii.220). Antonio is also guilty of convincing Sebastian to kill his brother, Alonso, so he can claim the throne; when Gonzalo and Alonso were asleep, Antonio was busy telling Sebastian to kill his brother, saying “Here lies your brother,/No better than the earth he lies upon,/If he were that which now he's like, that's dead” (II.i.1018). Sebastian, as another antagonist, agrees with Antonio, saying “Thy case, dear friend, /Shall be my precedent; as thou got'st Milan,/I'll come by Naples. Draw thy sword: one stroke/Shall free thee from the tribute which thou payest;” (II.i.1029). Along with plotting to kill the king and his counselour, the two are cynical jokesters; for the first part where they’re introduced, they’re shown to be ridiculing Gonzalo for being optimistic. One such example is when Sebastian jokingly answers a literal answer to Gonzalo’s question, then when Gonzalo takes it seriously, says “You have taken it wiselier than I meant you should” (II.i.727). Another example of this joking and cynical nature is shown in Antonio, when he says Gonzalo “misses not much” when he talks of how green the grass is and how wonderful the island is (II.i.759). In saying that they’re static characters, it means that they do not change from this cynical, evil and joking manner from the beginning of the play to the end; this is correct, with an example of Sebastian continuing to joke about the situation is when he makes a snide remark about Caliban and the others, saying “Ha, ha!/What things are these, my lord Antonio?/Will money buy 'em?”, even though they had just been found by Prospero (V.i.2236). Antonio is never shown to improve either, as he is given little to no dialogue in the final act and is not shown often in the other acts, minus trying to get Sebastian to kill his brother. Overall, as two main protagonists of the play, they do their job well, and together are static and flat characters that never develop or learn from their mistakes, like Alonso and Prospero.

 

“Sebastian and Antonio Analysis” Reflection

The original for this piece is from a study guide for Act II of the Tempest by Shakespeare that we never actually turned in. The question regarded what kind of characters Sebastian and Antonio were based on Act II alone, and so I had a limited amount of writing that I could use. Along with that, I barely knew them as characters, but hey, I did it fairly well, I suppose. Even so, now that I see it again, it is very short, and I definitely am happy with the revision of it.

For the revision, I decided to change the main topic of what I was writing about. I decided to do an analysis of whether or not both Sebastian and Antonio were static characters, along with what kind of characters they had and their roles in the story. I added more quotes from the text regarding their characters, showing more than one example of them being cynical jokesters. To prove that Sebastian and Antonio were static, I provided quotes from the last act of the play that were almost identical to the first time we see them in Act II. I also suggested that they were antagonists and supplied evidence to show that they were, in fact, villains in the play (as they plot to kill the king). The revision is much lengthier than the original and I feel that it definitely fleshes more into the characters of Antonio and Sebastian than the original did.

© 2023 by EK. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page